Tuesday, February 3, 2015

ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY- Jersey Flight



If the justification of reason is itself circular then what is the analytical thinker really doing? 

Dry formalism, irrelevant formalism, academic technicality toward the display of superior proficiency?

The whole enterprise seems disingenuous: are analytical philosophers really doing what they claim to be doing? 

I suspect this is a cave for people with no imagination/ this is philosophy without creativity/ this is not philosophy, this is bondage, stagnation; this is what it looks like for a philosopher to stand in one place!

What does analytical philosophy really do (the word "really" being a reference to the world)?

Is this the secret path of wisdom? Is this the way of higher men? For here we multiply the questions of grammar; here philosophy is pushed back to bare syntax. This is no longer philosophy but the confusion of arbitrary linguistics, idealistic semantics. Men in search of control discuss the subjectivity of the symbol as though it were the secret path to objectivity. 

To be an analytical philosopher is to pretend that one is profound, precisely because one is amused.

-
-
-